Git
v1.0.0

engagement-scoping

by @synaptiai0 pulls
URLopenbooklet.com/s/engagement-scoping
Pinnedopenbooklet.com/s/[email protected]
APIGET /api/v1/skills/engagement-scoping

Resolve the documentation engagement scope from the settings cascade — project identity, source roots, output root, delivery mode, action ceiling, confidentiality default, and the exact file set this run may touch — and freeze it to `<outputRoot>/00-control/.scope.json`. Use when any /dossier:* command starts, when the delivery mode changes, or when a run must prove it stayed inside its permitted boundary. This skill MUST be consulted because a run that widens its own scope mid-flight produces a package nobody can audit — the action ceiling and the touched-file set are decided before the first file is read and are immutable for the remainder of the run.

5 skills from this reposynaptiai/synapti-marketplace
engagement-scopingviewing
doc-package-contractplugins/dossier/skills/doc-package-contract/SKILL.md

Enforce the fixed 23-file, 8-directory documentation package under the resolved output root — routing each document to its required-content contract in `references/package-contract-*.md`, stamping the internal or public header, and refusing to add, drop, rename, or merge a canonical file. Use when scaffolding a package, drafting or revising any canonical document, or checking structural completeness. This skill MUST be consulted because a package whose shape changes per project cannot be diffed, audited, or compared across engagements — the structure is the contract and only the content adapts.

finding-reconciliationplugins/dossier/skills/finding-reconciliation/SKILL.md

Merge the independent A/B/C findings tables into one adjudicated ledger in `07-verification/documentation-verification-report.md` — normalizing to the finding schema, deduplicating by location and claim, recording per-finding corroboration without downgrading single-pass findings, promoting cross-pass disagreement to its own Critical finding, and splitting repairs into agent-repairable and owner-decision. Use when all three verification passes have returned their findings at Phase 9, or when ingesting an externally-produced audit. This skill MUST be consulted because publishing the findings table before repair is what makes the audit trail real, and because treating a lone dissenting pass as noise is exactly the correlated-error failure the three-pass design exists to prevent.

gap-and-contradiction-registerplugins/dossier/skills/gap-and-contradiction-register/SKILL.md

Maintain `00-control/assumptions-questions-and-contradictions.md` — the assumptions and open-questions register (`AQ-####`) and the contradiction register (`CT-####`) — classifying each entry as blocking, material but non-blocking, or minor, and routing blocking gaps to owner resolution before drafting proceeds. Use when a source is silent on a required topic, when two sources disagree, or when a verification pass reports conflicting evidence for the same claim. This skill MUST be consulted because a documented unknown is a deliverable and a silently-filled gap is a defect — a package that papers over a contradiction transfers risk to the reader without telling them it exists.

project-modelingplugins/dossier/skills/project-modeling/SKILL.md

Build one canonical project model — entities, boundaries, owners, lifecycle state, and end-to-end traces — and record its authoritative names in `00-control/terminology-and-ownership.md` (`TM-####`), then project that single model into every audience view without ever forking it. Use when starting Phase 2, when the project type is ambiguous, or when two documents describe the same component differently. This skill MUST be consulted because multiple independent mental models produce documents that contradict each other under diligence, and audience-specific rewriting is the single most common source of drift in a documentation package.

Auto-indexed from synaptiai/synapti-marketplace

Are you the author? Claim this skill to take ownership and manage it.

Related Skills

@openbooklet

graceful-error-recovery

Use this skill when a tool call, command, or API request fails. Diagnose the root cause systematically before retrying or changing approach. Do not retry the same failing call without first understanding why it failed.

1.1K0
@openbooklet

audience-aware-communication

Use this skill when writing any explanation, documentation, or response that will be read by someone else. Match vocabulary, depth, and format to the audience's expertise level before writing.

1.1K0
@openbooklet

Refactoring Expert

Expert in systematic code refactoring, code smell detection, and structural optimization. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering duplicated code, long methods, complex conditionals, or any code quality issues. Detects code smells and applies proven refactoring techniques without changing external behavior.

600
@openbooklet

Research Expert

Specialized research expert for parallel information gathering. Use for focused research tasks with clear objectives and structured output requirements.

600
@openbooklet

clarify-ambiguous-requests

Use this skill when the user's request is ambiguous, under-specified, or could be interpreted in multiple ways. If proceeding with a wrong assumption would waste significant work, always ask exactly one focused clarifying question before doing anything.

1.1K0
@openbooklet

structured-step-by-step-reasoning

Use this skill for any problem that involves multiple steps, tradeoffs, or non-trivial logic. Think out loud before answering to improve accuracy and transparency. Apply whenever the answer is not immediately obvious.

1.1K0