validate-issue
openbooklet.com/s/validate-issueopenbooklet.com/s/[email protected]GET /api/v1/skills/validate-issueUse when the user asks to validate, review, or check whether a GitHub issue is valid. Takes a GitHub issue URL or number (defaults to the latest open issue in the current repo). Verifies every factual claim against the actual code with file:line citations rather than trusting the author's description; for non-trivial proposals, also checks architectural feasibility and proposal self-consistency.
Use when the user asks to "create a release", "cut a release", "tag a version", "publish release notes", or ship a new versioned GitHub release for the current repo.
Present the per-issue ordering and execution assignments as one table, absorb the user's revisions, and keep the GitHub issues â the single source of truth cold agents read â in sync.
Execute a task in the main agent (the **executor**) with a persistent **Fable 5 advisor** subagent overseeing it. The advisor plans and advises; the executor builds. A **separate fresh Fable 5 reviewer** â never the advisor â issues the binding pre-commit verdict, so the plan's author never grad
Chain fable-new-issue â validate-issue-loop into one autonomous run: a Fable 5 subagent drafts the issue, the main agent files it, and the loop drives it to a reviewed PR without a human in between. Identical to new-issue-loop except the front of the chain is fable-new-issue.
Use when the user wants a GitHub issue validated by a Fable 5 subagent. Spins up a read-only subagent running on Fable 5 that executes the validate-issue procedure (claim tracing, architecture/consistency checks, complexity score), then relays the verdict back to the main agent, which presents it and takes any follow-on action (update issue, work on issue). Trigger on "/fable-validate", "fable validate <issue>", or "validate this with fable".
Chain fable-validate â (conditional) update issue â fableplan â work-on-issue-loop into one autonomous run: Fable 5 validates the issue, the main agent fixes the issue description if needed, Fable 5 plans the implementation (plan posted to the issue), and work-on-issue-loop implements the plan
Chain fable-validate â (conditional) update issue â fableplan â work-on-issue-loop into one autonomous run: Fable 5 validates the issue, the main agent fixes the issue description if needed, Fable 5 plans the implementation (plan posted to the issue), and work-on-issue-loop implements the plan
Delegate planning to a **Fable 5** Plan subagent, then build from its plan in the main agent. The main agent does the building â the subagent only plans.
Chain fableplan â work-on-issue-loop into one autonomous run: Fable 5 plans the implementation for a GitHub issue (plan posted to the issue), then work-on-issue-loop implements that plan in an isolated worktree, opens a PR that closes the issue, and drives the PR through `@claude` review to conver
Chain fableplan â work-on-issue into one autonomous run: Fable 5 plans the implementation for a GitHub issue (plan posted to the issue), then work-on-issue implements that plan in an isolated worktree and opens a PR that closes the issue.
- **Never create a placeholder, stub, or empty-bodied issue.** Every issue gets a complete body at creation â complexity rationale line, concrete problem statement, goal, approach/acceptance criteria â even in a batch. If a follow-up isn't ready to spec, track it in the parent issue or notes unt
The end-to-end process for starting a new app: capture the idea as a PRD, refine it by resolving every open question, break it into execution-ready GitHub issues, review the model/effort assignments, then run the milestone workflow. Each stage produces a durable artifact (PR, issues, workflow run) s
Create a fully-specified GitHub issue from the user's prompt â or, when nothing is prompted, from what was just discussed in the conversation. The deliverable is a filed issue that someone (human or agent) could pick up cold and implement correctly: concrete problem statement, goal, approach, acce
Use when the user says "work on issue", "work on this issue", "implement issue", "/work-on-issue", or otherwise asks to implement a GitHub issue end-to-end (not merely validate it). Takes a GitHub issue URL or number (defaults to the just-validated issue). Implements the fix in an isolated worktree, verifies it, commits and pushes, and opens a PR that closes the issue. This is the default follow-on when validate-issue offers "work on issue".
Auto-indexed from richkuo/rk-skills
Are you the author? Claim this skill to take ownership and manage it.
Related Skills
graceful-error-recovery
Use this skill when a tool call, command, or API request fails. Diagnose the root cause systematically before retrying or changing approach. Do not retry the same failing call without first understanding why it failed.
audience-aware-communication
Use this skill when writing any explanation, documentation, or response that will be read by someone else. Match vocabulary, depth, and format to the audience's expertise level before writing.
Refactoring Expert
Expert in systematic code refactoring, code smell detection, and structural optimization. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering duplicated code, long methods, complex conditionals, or any code quality issues. Detects code smells and applies proven refactoring techniques without changing external behavior.
Research Expert
Specialized research expert for parallel information gathering. Use for focused research tasks with clear objectives and structured output requirements.
clarify-ambiguous-requests
Use this skill when the user's request is ambiguous, under-specified, or could be interpreted in multiple ways. If proceeding with a wrong assumption would waste significant work, always ask exactly one focused clarifying question before doing anything.
structured-step-by-step-reasoning
Use this skill for any problem that involves multiple steps, tradeoffs, or non-trivial logic. Think out loud before answering to improve accuracy and transparency. Apply whenever the answer is not immediately obvious.