ql-brainstorm
Part of the quantum-loop autonomous development pipeline (brainstorm → spec → plan → execute → review → verify). Deep Socratic exploration of a feature idea before implementation. Asks questions one at a time, proposes 2-3 alternative approaches with trade-offs, presents design section-by-section for approval, and saves an approved design document. Use when starting a new feature, exploring an idea, or before writing a spec. Triggers on: brainstorm, explore idea, design this, think through, ql-brainstorm.
zoonk-business
Business decision-making framework for AI agents. Use when making strategic decisions, evaluating trade-offs, or ensuring alignment with Zoonk's mission and values.
architecture-design
Use when designing new systems or significant features, evaluating architectural trade-offs, choosing between structural approaches, or when a task requires understanding system-wide design before writing code
game-concept
Design game concepts from a novel. From SOURCE_BIBLE and PRODUCT_BRIEF, compare meaningful alternatives on the dimensions still unlocked, then select a playable direction using hard vetoes and explicit trade-offs. Use for what game should this novel become, compare game concepts, choose a game direction for this book, decide whether this novel should become an interactive story. å°è¯´æ¸¸ææ¦å¿µè®¾è®¡ãæ ¹æ® SOURCE_BIBLE ä¸ PRODUCT_BRIEF æ¯è¾æªéå®ç»´åº¦ä¸çæææ¿ä»£æ¹æ¡ï¼ç¨ç¡¬å¦å³åå ³é®åèéæ©å¯ç©æ¹åãç¨äºå¤æå°è¯´éååæä»ä¹æ¸¸æã该ä¸è¯¥åæäºå¨åäºãæ¯è¾æ¸¸ææ¹æ¡çéæ±ã
binder-design
Guidance for choosing the right protein binder design tool. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).
mcaf-adr-writing
Create or update an ADR under `docs/ADR/` for architectural decisions, dependency changes, data-model changes, or cross-cutting policy shifts. Use when the user asks to write, update, or document an ADR, record a design decision, capture architecture trade-offs, or justify a repo-wide technical policy.
awrshift
Adaptive decision framework â one dynamic flow with user checkpoints at every phase. Guides from problem to solution through structured research, metrics, factcheck, and sandbox testing. Use when you face a non-trivial decision, need to research before building, plan a feature or experiment, evaluate trade-offs, or the user says 'awrshift', 'let's think this through', 'research first', 'experiment', 'investigate', 'what's the best approach', 'compare options'. Also trigger on: 'иÑÑледÑй', 'ÑазбеÑиÑÑ', 'пÑоанализиÑÑй', 'ÑкÑпеÑименÑ', or when starting any new project phase, migration, launch, or architecture decision. Do NOT use for simple tasks with clear instructions â just do those directly.